Skip to main content

Laws and Ethics : LJ6

 Part 1: Social Media Laws and Ethics

I thought these two chapters on laws, regulations and ethics were a great read. The chapters emphasize the gray area that new technologies reside in when it comes to the law. I especially found the section that broke down Facebook's Terms and Conditions to be very eye-opening. As Lipschultz says, "too frequently, users click to gain access without reading and understanding terms, which specific rules covering vague areas of the law" (Lipschultz 2021). I fall into this category. It's hard to completely blame Facebook for their invasiveness, when I as a consumer turn a blind eye. While knowing this will not affect my use of social media (since I was made already aware of their invasiveness), it does make me question the ethics even further. I believe that Facebook keeping content that consumers purposefully deleted is wrong and all the information gathered under their "data policy" is completely unethical to document. 

Part 2: Social Media Lies and Propaganda 

I really enjoyed reading the article that describes how even rational people can fall for propaganda. The article found that "higher levels of cognitive reflection were associated with increased ability to discern fake and real news, and generally more responsible social media use" (Stecula & Pickup, 2021). I have seen this within my own life during these past couple of years. Many of my family members sent propaganda (and "facts" that weren't proven to be true) about COVID-19 to me through Facebook. Aligning with Stecula and Pickup's research, the family members that sent these messages have had a history of not being able to ignore invalid or misguided intuition.

 Learning this information will not change how I use social media. Since the pandemic (and all the other bad things about 2020) started, I have already gotten fairly good at deciding what is real. This includes checking sources and cross-referencing (or checking) multiple media outlets. Similarities in the details shown across multiple credible sources tend to make me a little more comfortable with believing.  Checking the origin of content is very important to me, as The Washington Post highlights the many ways pieces of content can be altered, including "splicing", "omission" , "doctoring" and "fabrication" (WP Company, 2019). Additionally, I try to stick to news outlets that do not let their personal feelings get in the way. I've found that gathering news about my country from other countries tend to have a more neutral perspective. Along with this, I usually do not go to social media for news. This is due to it being "a source of news associated with greater likelihood of encoring various conspiracy theories" (Stecula & Pickup, 2021). 


Reference:

Lipschultz, J. H. (2021). Social Media Communication: Concepts, practices, data, Law and Ethics. Routledge. 

Stecula, D. A., & Pickup, M. (2021, June 8). Social Media, cognitive reflection, and conspiracy beliefs. Frontiers. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.647957/full 

WP Company. (2019, June 25). The Washington Post's Guide to Manipulated Video. The Washington Post. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/politics/fact-checker/manipulated-video-guide/?utm_term=.cd779e27a0d0&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Social Media & The Entertainment Industry : LJ8

       This week's readings were very intriguing because it's something I think about often. Social media has affected the entertainment industry in various ways. Streaming services are starting to ruin the "going out and seeing a movie" experience, with digital media driving "46% of movie box office revenue, despite making up just 14% of studio marketing budgets" (Malnar, 2020).  Likewise, music streaming services and traditional ways of promoting and showing music are being affected by social media. Record labels are already beginning to shift away from focusing on streaming services, saying "With an expanding number of partnerships including Facebook, Tiktok, and Snap, among others, social media is already a meaningful nine-figure revenue stream for us and is growing at a faster rate than subscription streaming (Ingham, 2020).       I believe there are pros and cons to this advancement. Before social media, famous people usually had c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Images and Messaging : LJ5

Focusing on Flickr this week was very refreshing, as it's not a social media platform that I hear or think about that often. I remember that I used to use Flickr when I was a kid (around and thought I wanted to be a blogger or photographer. It was cool to get back on the site and see how things have changed. It was intriguing to read about the impact that Flickr has had on how we as a society view photos, since Flickr was in the photo-sharing game long before Instagram. It marked the beginning of the shift in how we take and experience photos as well. "The everyday image becomes something that even the amateur can create and comment on with relative authority and ease" (Murray, 2008). The average person can now become creators of content as well as let go of the hierarchy surrounding photography. In explaining that "the nature of photography now is it's in motion" the Journal of Visual Culture highlights the shift in how we view photos (Murray, 2008). I thi...
Post a Comment
Read more